
During the past decades, a plethora of experimental results has firmly established that strong interaction phenomena in particle physics are correctly described by a theory known as Quantum Chromo Dynamics (QCD). While to date there are no experimental results contradicting QCD predictions, this beautiful theory, together with a deep understanding of many fundamental issues, also brings in one theoretical conundrum. QCD depends on two dimensionless fundamental parameters whose value is not predicted by the theory, but must be determined experimentally. The first one,
An elegant mechanism to guarantee the vanishing of θ was proposed in 1977 by Roberto Peccei and Helen Quinn. The Peccei-Quinn (PQ) mechanism implies the existence of a particle of zero spin and, in first approximation, of zero mass, which is commonly referred to as the axion. There are, however, subtle corrections to the first order approximation, which imply that the axion is not exactly massless, but it acquires a tiny mass
One of the most peculiar property of axions is that they couple to a pair of photons (see fig. 1). While the strength of the axion-photon coupling
The problem of defining on a more solid phenomenological basis the region inside which axion searches should focus, has been recently addressed by Luca Di Luzio (Durham University), Federico Mescia (Barcellona University), and Enrico Nardi (LNF). The results of this research have been published in the one of the last issues of the renowned Physical Review Letters, and the article was highlighted as a Physical Review Letters Editors’ suggestion.

The authors proceeded to classify a large set of axion models, selecting as phenomenologically preferred those that do not give rise to cosmological issues (in the form of cosmologically stable strongly interacting relics), and where the strength of the interactions between the known particles (for example the leptons and the quarks) does not become infinite below the Planck energy. The authors have identified fifteen cases that satisfy these criteria. They define a phenomenologically preferred axion window, which is delimited with the two continuous lines in Fig. 2, labeled E/N=44/3 and E/N=5/3. (For comparison, the region that was so far considered as the most interesting is also depicted, enclosed between the two dashed lines). By combining among them the fifteen models, other possibilities that still satisfy the two conditions can be constructed. They span the larger region colored in the figure in light yellow, which is delimited by the dot-dashed line labeled E/N=170/3. Within this enlarged region, enhancements of the axion-photon couplings of almost one order of magnitude are possible. However, in a few cases it can also happen that the axion decouples almost completely from the photon, so that the region has no lower boundary.
It is expected that this analysis will contribute to focus the experimental efforts for axion searches towards the parameter space region encompassing the phenomenologically most appealing axion models.
The article is freely available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.07593 (Enrico Nardi)